Friday, August 26, 2011

Tran: The Final Solution


The Wannsee Conference.


Genocide is never accidental, but a premeditated and concise plan that is carried out efficiently. In the film Conspiracy, the Third Reich officials are laying down the ground works for the ‘Final Solution’ that was already underway. It is evident in this film that the Nazis didn’t care about Jewish people individually, but they just wanted to get rid of them collectively. It didn’t matter whether Jews were from the Soviet Union or Germany; they were all the same though there was discussion in this film about the differences between them. The Final Solution was already in motion and these men were only there to give their support. It is interesting how the two Polish officials wanted to expedite the extermination of their Jews because the ghettos were becoming a problem in their country. The Jews had to be exterminated as a whole in all of Europe and with the new gassing method—at an aggressive rate.

Night is account of one of the millions of stories of the suffering and traumatic experiences of victims during the war and the Holocaust. One of the most surprising revelation in Weisel’s novel is how late in the war was when his community was deported. The Wannsee Conference happened in 1942 and that plan was carried out immediately, but it wasn’t until the spring of 1944 when deportation actually reached Wiesel home of Sighet. Deportation in Hungary was happening much earlier and I suppose they were clearing out the Jews there first which took longer. It’s strange to think around the same time; France was being liberated, while this was only then coming to Romania. No one in this community could have imaged what was going on or what would happen to them, but there were warnings from Moshe. No one listened to him or the woman who screamed ‘fire!’ while on the train. As Weisel recounts his life from that time, he could have never imagined losing half his family or where they would end up. It’s sadden and astounding to read his words as he becomes more and more numb throughout the novel because he no longer has hopes or fears of anything. He mentions how he became ashamed of himself when he contemplates his father dying sooner so his survival rate would be better. He says though that there were so many others who had family with them, but in the end you could only think of yourself and your survival. He fought to keep his father alive for as long as he could, but it wasn’t enough and he barely survived the last few months himself. He writes how those months before April 1945 were all a blur to him because it didn’t even matter anymore and he lost himself in all the madness.

Regardless of the The Soviet Story’s accuracy in depicting the correlation between Stalin’s regime and Hitler’s, it does shed light on the Ukraine massacre that most don’t even know about. The clips and photos from that Ukraine are so similar to the ones that came out the concentration camps. In the article on the Ukrainian Genocide it even states, “Stalin turned Ukraine into one large concentration camp.” It’s hard to even comprehend seven million people dying in a span of a year, though about 800,000 people were killed in Rwanda in a span of 100 days. In a way, Stalin’s regime was just as brutal as Hitler if not more so. He set up concentration camp for his own people and deported people to labor camps in remote areas and relocated many to Siberia. The film’s interview with people who were affected by this shows how there has been no justice for the victims and there might never be because present day Russian won’t speak of the Soviet past in that negative way. The war ended in 1945, but Stalin’s Soviet regime continued to nearly the end of the 20th century and even more died post WWII era.

6 comments:

  1. Tregre: Response Week 1
    The opening sentence on your second paragraph is pretty powerful. Your blog post really focuses on the planning of these genocides and mass murders. They were so systematic and organized making the killing effortless and very effective. Killing seven million people in one year is unheard of! The survivors of the concentration camps in my opinion had it worse than the causalities. They will forever had to wake up knowing that their worst fears were carried out and that their most precious loved ones were robbed by them. What do they have to live for now? Their mind will be forever be imprinted with the Night that covered their world. The mental disaster was far worse than the physical aspect of the genocide. They cannot escape the truth and images that will forever cross their mind. The mental scars were more deep than the physical scars. Some never healed...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your point about support in your discussion of Wansee is relevant; however, it isn't just support that Heidrich was seeking for Hitler, it was a legal document that could protect the perpetrators. In fact, no legal document can protect those who carry out such genocides. Look at our laws, we had laws supporting Jim Crow Segregation, laws allowing slaves to be returned to their masters evan from the free states, but that did not make the laws morally justifiable.
    I would like you do more with your statement about the accuracy of comparing Stalin's regime with Hitler's. I would like you to develop that argument more fully.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm really glad that your post placed such emphasis on the Wansee Conference, because the film Conspiracy truly opened my eyes to all of the premeditated planning that went into that world war. As Dr. McCay states, the Wansee Conference was meant to seek protection for the perpetrators, yet with such massive genocide, this is impossible. This film served as a unique transition into Soviet Story, where we take what we learn in the film and apply it to striking images and the actual, horrifying events of the world war (where we see Stalin and Hitler and you try to compare). Noting that Hitler obviously supported the Nazi Party and Stalin was a communist, I think it is overall important to note that their biggest similarity is that both are in favor of a form of Totalitarian regime. In such a regime, the state recognizes that there are no limits to its authority and strives to regulate any and all aspects of private and public life. Soviet Story, for example, mentions the Italian Fascists and Japan as such regimes that were known for their terror, and the film adds Nazi Germany as one of history's most horrifying political entities. For both Stalin and Hitler, individuality is completely lost in their people, and this is perfectly acceptable. There are so many consequences to this type of power, yet Hitler nor Stalin can recognize this. I would lastly note that i thought your emphasis on the element of deportation was very relevant/important. The sense of "numbness" is certainly what I got out of reading Night when he discusses the marches to new camps, etc, and I think it is important to note how this is just another, major way in which these individuals freedom and individuality was robbed from them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Regarding the laws, in the film, Stukart was so adamant about making sure the laws allowed them to legally 'evacuate' and 'sterilize' the Jewish population. He felt what Heydrich was saying went against the Nuremberg Laws and was worried about the problems that would rise from deportation or what was considered a 'Jew'. He too wanted to get rid of the Jews, but to do it in a way there questions would arise and they wouldn't have to worry about the consequences. He truly wanted to uphold the bindings of the Nurember Laws which would lawfully allow them to persecute the Jews if they did it rationally.
    I do think Stalin's and Hitler's regime were quite similar. Granted, they had different agendas, but at the end of the day whether it was Nazism or Communism, they both were just dictators. Though both leader said they were doing this for the better of 'their people' and 'their country' they were just doing it for themselves and what they wanted. They both got rid of people that threaten them: Hitler and the Jews and those who approved Nazism and Stalin with the educated and rich. In the film, there were comparisons between propaganda posters and they looked eerily similar. They were doing no favors for their countries by engaging in wars with their neighbors.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked how you said that the Final Solution was already in motion and that all that was wanted was an opinion. You would think, judging how most of the guests where behaving, that they were about to individually change the world with the ranks and titles that they brought. What would they say now?
    Besides, while their opinion was of course taken into account, no one was going to stop this, not once it was put in motion. They had such a good idea that what they were doing was incredibly heinous that they started it without the conference and without approval from the guests. It's not until after the fact that the Wansee convention knew about the plan and by then, well, by then they had no real choice but to give in.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kerr Comment 1, Week 1: I think the point about the Nazi officials attempting to “legalize” genocide is an important point I may have overlooked in writing my own post for this week. The majority of men in the Wannsee conference were lawyers and all were highly concerned with protecting themselves. The very fact that they were so concerned about protection from the potential legal consequences of such an act demonstrates that these men understood the moral depravity of their actions. It is a ridiculous idea to think that genocide could be legalized. The idea of “work” camps in which Jews would undertake certain projects and eventually die as a result of extreme conditions may have seemed a less “extreme” way to exterminate mass populations of people than lining them up and shooting them by the thousands. By less extreme I mean less direct responsibility as essentially the Jews die on there own as a result of starvation. Clearly the Nazi’s are just as responsible for the deaths of millions, but it may have seemed easier to justify sterilization or work camps in order to escape legal consequences if ever caught. Another interesting concept is that all records omitted the direct discussion of “killing” Jews instead preferring the term “evacuate.” As the movie Conspiracy presumes, much of what was said may have been omitted from the minutes. The records were also destroyed in an attempt to cover the evidence at the end of the war, but one copy of the minutes were discovered in the under secretary’s possessions.

    I liked your discussion of the Ukraine genocide. I agree that it is sadly overlooked by many people and much of the blame is placed on Hitler when Stalin also played a significant role in the events that occured. This brings me back to the question of responsibility which I believe is key in this week's discussion. Holding Hitler solely responsible or even mostly responsible would be a colossal mistake. In addition to his own mass killings and terrible acts of power, Stalin returned escaped Jews to the Nazi party and supported Hitler in order to further his own political agenda. The United States failed to intervene until 6 million Jews had been annihilated and The League of Nations failed miserably in its sole purpose--to prevent another war from taking place after WWI.

    ReplyDelete