I have seen "District 9" before and never saw the
allegory of apartheid in South
Africa. It makes complete sense now. This
was a great way to end the course with a summary of the root of genocide.
Genocide is not just about the murder of an ethnic group, but also about the
murder of souls, spirits, and wills. It has been clear through the course that
genocide is not just scary because of the mass killings, but the hatred and
immense terror involved in these systematic plans.
In "District 9," the "Prawns" were the
others. They were identified as a derogatory term after their spacecraft landed
on Earth. Prawns were the others that deviated from the norm. At first they are
labeled as inferior and then confined to District 9. They were excluded from
the humans to live with others like them. This made it known that being a Prawn
would set them apart from the human population. The steps to a genocide starts
with identification and identifying the ethnic group who do not belong and are
inferior to the rest. Then the exclusion. This creates isolation where, psychologically,
the gap between the two different species starts to grow and become larger.
This can also aid in depersonalization. When it is one unit of something
unfamiliar, such as the unfamiliar aliens, then it is easier to amass them as
one group instead of individuals. This makes it easier to start to exterminate
the mass. As the steps begin to progress to exclusion, that is when tension
starts to become stronger. It is the calm and waiting before the storm. Then
sometimes usually happens to make it snap. This was when Smit and his
father-in-law start to relocate the aliens again with eviction notices. This is
to separate the Prawns even more from normal life. They were the invaders that
did not deserve to live a normal life. Then the extermination begins. When the
Prawns, or suppressed people begin to feel the need to rise up in order to feel
alive and having a life again, that is what sparks the hatred which usually
boils over. In "District 9" it was when Christopher's (an alien)
friend was killed by a xenophobic soldier. This started a series of events. It
gets really tricky when lines start to get blurred, like when Wikus turns into
a Prawn. When it is realized that this situation is no longer black and white
and a Prawn and human can be interchangeable, it fuels the fear in the genocide
and getting rid of the aliens. From here on in the movie, more and more deaths
occurred. It also changes the viewpoint of the people or Prawn who was
transforming. When Wikus transformed into a Prawn, he saw their point of view.
The less human he became, the more humane he became. It was an irony like one
sees in many of our previous assignments. When one would see that everyone
bleeds red and that they are not all that different besides the color of one's
skin or different beliefs, no one is really inferior after all.
The same things happened in the movie, "Hotel
Rwanda" and the "Conspiracy Theory." The Jews and the Tutsis
were known that they were the inferior race. They were labeled as outcasts.
Then they were separated from the "norms" in society. The Jews were
sent to ghettos and then extracted and put into concentration camps, while the
Tutsis were separated from their families who were non-Tutsis and the white
people. They were set apart and not around the normal people. When people are
confined to one place, it is easier to kill masses and to individualize people,
therefore one cannot get emotionally attached. Next the killing occurred. The Jews
and Tutsis were just slaughtered. It did not matter if they were female, had
children, or pled for their life. It was the end for them simply because of
their ethnicity and culture. Both films had people on the "supremacy"
side who did not agree with what their own kind was doing. When a man did not
believe that all Jews should be killed in "The Conspiracy Theory," he
was threatened with a concentration camp himself. Then in "Hotel
Rwanda" the main character had to risk his life in order to save his family.
He felt their isolation and these characters felt torn.
Important articles to reflect this methodology is the Elie
Wiesel's Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech and the Rwandan Genocide Lessons
Learned article. Both of these knowledge the tragedy, but how to learn from
these mistakes. This genocide method is clearly explained and then how to learn
and stop it. It is so important not to classify people in a hierarchy and to
exclude others. That is how genocide starts. Wiesel believed that if more people
spoke up and indifference was not shown, lives could have been saved. The
Lessons Learned in the Rwandan Genocide article explained that awareness to
serious problems must be answered to. The identification of those less
desirable in a given society is what fuels the fire and is escalates from
there. It was seen in each movie the identification. One was a Jew, a Tutsi, a
homosexual, a Prawn, etc. All of these names enabled hatred and fear from the
different grow into a full-blown genocide. Their personalities did not matter,
nor did their family, status, etc. It was their label. Then they were excluded
from the rest. This made the outcasts and made it easier for one to go along
with the crowd and hate the less desirable humans and then go as far as killing
them. Each genocide could have been stopped if one looked past the surface of a
person and into their hearts (not to be cheesy!) Every person has an innate
desire to belong to a home and function in a society. Disrupting this need can
be detrimental to a race.
This was a great wrap up assignment for the course.
It has been so evident from the very start of this journey into the Holocaust from Elie Wiesel's testimony of genocide how horrific the assault on life was. As you stated, it murders one's soul, spirit, and will. Elie Wiesel shares how it stole his faith in a loving God. The immense terror you speak of that assailed so many lives is truly one of the most unfathomable aspects. It makes me think of Rwanda Revisualized, it speaks of the aftermath of genocide and how genocide is portrayed. It said the pictures of the dead is not a picture of the genocide. This seems so true especially when it comes to capturing the immense terror that people had to endure for so long. How imcomprehensible it is to imagine the fortitude and the stamina those people had to have to endure. For us to lose one loved one can seem unbearable. How did they continue to survive? Like Kenan suggested in the Cellist of Sarajevo there must have been so many walking ghosts - they were dead already from witnessing so much loss, yet they still walked. But in the midst of all the atrocity, thankfully the books and films gave us so many instances of hope and so many outlooks of how people endured - music, faith, family, hope, writing, reporting, speaking out, silent reflection. But one of the greatest lessons I take from this is to keep helping other people, to keep reaching out to those in need, to keep the faith and this will help you to retain your humanity.
ReplyDeletegood blog. Your point about turning the "other" into a subspecies or a bottom feeder is important. The Nazis did it as well.
ReplyDelete